“As an open access journal, ACS Central Science is always looking for more ways to support open science,” says Carolyn Bertozzi, Ph.D., editor in chief of ACS Central Science. If all parties agree, their reports and responses will be published alongside an article as Supporting Information. For a manuscript to undergo the new process, all authors and reviewers must opt into transparent peer review. Under this new format, readers will benefit by seeing how peer review shaped and strengthened the final article. Traditionally, ACS journals have used a model of peer review in which the reviewers’ comments and the authors’ response were visible only to those who participated in the review of the manuscript. Seeing real examples of other researchers’ reviews and comments can be an invaluable tool for these young scientists.” It serves another function in helping to educate early career researchers who are just beginning to review or publish research articles. “Transparent peer review promotes open science by providing access to the exchange between reviewers and authors. “This new approach provides insight into an essential part of the publication process that has been typically kept private,” says Sarah Tegen, Ph.D., senior vice president, Journals Publishing Group at ACS. For authors and reviewers who choose to participate, transparent peer review makes the reviewers’ comments and the authors’ response to the reviewers visible to readers of a published article. As a part of its commitment to open science, the Publications Division of the American Chemical Society (ACS) is piloting a new peer review process, called transparent peer review, in two of its journals, ACS Central Science and The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |